Scripture-Pressed Clarity. No Dialogue. No Dilution.
Foundation: Truth, Not Trend
Pressing Words exists to declare truth—not to negotiate it. We do not entertain cultural relativism, progressive reinterpretation, or theological softening. Our editorial stance is built on the sufficiency of Scripture and the urgency of calling the church back to conviction. We write with clarity, not subtlety; with urgency, not diplomacy.
We do not seek to persuade the unregenerate. We speak to the church—to those with ears to hear. Our words are Scripture-sensitive, not seeker-sensitive. We expose compromise, name deception, and press truth against the soft underbelly of modern Christianity.
Impartiality: Not Balance, But Boldness
We do not offer “both sides.” We offer biblical clarity. Our editorial process is rigorous, but not neutral. We weigh evidence through the lens of Scripture, not cultural consensus. To those committed to ideological pluralism, our stance will feel unfair. We make no apology for that. Truth is not balanced—it is sharp.
Editorial Integrity & Independence
We are independent of political, commercial, or institutional influence. Our editorial decisions are shaped by biblical conviction, not by audience metrics or cultural trends. We do not chase relevance. We chase faithfulness.
Harm & Offense
We do not engage in personal attacks. But we do speak plainly about sin, embodiment, identity, and holiness. Offense is inevitable when truth confronts compromise. We do not soften our words to avoid discomfort. We write to warn, not to win approval.
Serving the Church
Our editorial mission is ecclesial, not cultural. We write to expose worldly ideologies infiltrating the church. We call Christians back to biblical clarity. We challenge the fog of compromise with the light of Scripture. Our goal is not to entertain or persuade—it is to awaken and convict.
Fairness & Respect
We treat contributors and readers with dignity. But we do not flatter. We do not dilute. Our tone is firm, our convictions unapologetic. Respect does not mean silence. Love does not mean softness.
Privacy
We do not publish private correspondence or engage in public rebuttals of personal exchanges. Our editorial space is reserved for truth, not quarrels. We do not host comment sections or letters to the editor. We write to proclaim, not to debate.
Pen Names: A Tradition of Truth-Telling
Pressing Words uses pen names—not to obscure truth, but to protect those who speak it. This is not a retreat from accountability, but a strategic alignment with a long and honorable tradition of anonymous clarity.
Throughout history, pen names have served as literary armor for non-fiction writers confronting cultural hostility:
- Benjamin Franklin, at 16, wrote as Silence Dogood to critique colonial hypocrisy. He later adopted Richard Saunders and Alice Addertongue to satirize and instruct.
- Publius was the shared pseudonym of Hamilton, Madison, and Jay, authors of the Federalist Papers, who shaped the U.S. Constitution under cover of anonymity.
- George Orwell (Eric Blair) used his pen name to critique totalitarianism and cultural decay with prophetic clarity.
- Mary Ann Evans, writing as George Eliot, used a male pseudonym to ensure her theological and philosophical essays were taken seriously.
- Advice columnists like Ann Landers and Dear Abby tackled moral and cultural dilemmas under pseudonyms to preserve focus and privacy.
In theological and cultural writing, pen names allow truth-tellers to confront compromise without being silenced by personal targeting. We stand in this tradition. Our contributors write under cover—not to hide, but to endure. Our transparency lies in the clarity of our convictions, not the exposure of our identities.
Plus, we just think it’s fun!